I accept that if we leave the EU, there will be a period of economic and social change. What will happen? We will simply adapt - as we have done so many times in the past. Evolution is driven by random events. Sometimes you make a decision that doesn’t turn out the way you expect. We should not be staying in the EU simply because it will be be less disruptive in the short-term than pulling out - which appears to be the only viable argument I have heard so far.
When I voted to join the EEC, I voted to join an economic union with 6 countries. Nobody has since asked me if I want political union with 27 countries. If I did want political union - and I can see certain advantages to that - then we would need to be in the Euro, which apparently we shall never be. I am not clear what it is we are being asked to stay in.
I generally don’t favour large organisations. Efficiencies of scale are mostly lost by extreme waste of resource, glacially slow decision making, and the over-remuneration and over-empowerment of a tiny minority (mostly unelected) that have risen to their level of incompetence. Europe is no different than any other large organisation in this respect and it is why I choose not to work for one.
I am not left-wing, right-wing or anything in between. I run a business that at present relies mainly on trade with Europe. I am a free thinker and generally make the best decisions I can based on the best evidence available to me at the time. So all in all I am more in favour of leaving than staying. The available evidence may change before I need to vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment